Who Gets to Narrate the United States?
The NFL protest runs a lot deeper than you think
If you peel back
the many layers of controversy which surround the NFL’s national anthem protest,
you will find two very different versions of the United States.* They are reflected, to a large degree, by the
political divide between Left and Right.
A Nation of White Oppressors
NFL quarterback, Colin
Kaepernick, who started the protest movement in 2016, said, "I am not
going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black
people and people of color." Kaepernick’s
view of the U.S. as a nation of white oppressors dominates American universities. It has made its way into many public schools
as well.
The intellectual champion
of this perspective is Howard Zinn (d. 2010), author of the celebrated and
controversial text, A People's History of the United States. Zinn takes a dark, cynical view of the U.S.
and its history. He weaves a historical
narrative of unrelenting greed, exploitation, oppression, racism, social theft,
and even genocide, all committed by white Europeans and American capitalists
against people of color. According to Zinn,
the Founding Fathers campaigned for war to distract the people from their own
economic problems and arrest popular movements.
This strategy, he claims would continue to be used in the future by the
country's leaders
Modern progress
towards equality is largely an illusion in Zinn’s view. Fifty years of civil rights legislation, affirmative
action programs, school busing, and even the election of a black president to
two terms, have done little to change the sinister character of our
society. We are still, as Colin Kaepernick affirms, a nation of white oppressors.
Many people are,
for good reason, offended by Kaepernick’s view, and the refusal of NFL players
to stand for the national anthem as a show of respect (I grant that some
players may not be protesting for the same reason). White Americans who have made earnest efforts
to bring about a just society, and consider themselves tolerant and enlightened
citizens, are broad brushed as willing accomplices in racial oppression. This slur barely rises above ‘white shaming’
which equates skin color with oppression.
A Nation of Liberators
Arrayed
against this perspective is a more optimistic view of the U.S. and its history
rooted in the founding principles and our nation’s ability to overcome the
limitations of the past. I am not
referring here to the naïve triumphalism that has characterized some historical
narratives in the past. That narrative
is all but dead. Rather, it is possible
to celebrate the principles which make us a great nation while taking a sober
view of history that acknowledges past oppressions.
Integral
to this optimistic view is the belief that America
possesses the civil and moral virtue necessary to redress past
transgressions and overcome the limitations of bigotry and intolerance. Just as we eliminated slavery and
institutional racism, we will eventually overcome the limitations that bind us
in the present. America is not a nation
of oppressors, but liberators.
The Myth Lives On
Which
view is correct? Zinn’s history, though
popular, is regarded by many historians as an overly biased and simplistic version
of America’s past. He is not above stretching
some facts and ignoring others in order to squeeze history into the Procrustean
bed of his narrative. His view of
history only succeeds by adopting a myopic view of the U.S. and its past.
Moreover,
it is necessary to ask: If America is a nation of white oppressors, why do
millions of non-white immigrants from across the globe continue to frequent our
shores? Why are students from India and
Asia the top performers in many of our schools?
Why are there so many black athletes in professional sports? Etc.
Though
Zinn has passed off the scene, his narrative lives on in the Colin Kaepernicks of the world who
continue to perpetuate the dishonest and divisive myth of ‘America the white
oppressor.’
_________________________________________________
* This is not, and
never has been, a disagreement over free speech. No one, to my knowledge, is calling for the
government to censure the kneelers. And
since employers have the legal right to set codes of speech and conduct in the
workplace, employees who violate those codes are not protected by the First
Amendment as case law has shown.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_People%27s_History_of_the_United_States
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/december/wineburg-historiography-zinn-122012.html
http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1493 http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/09/25/gregg-jarrett-trump-is-correct-nfl-teams-can-legally-fire-players-for-their-conduct.html